Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:13039 comp.os.386bsd.development:1551 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1893 comp.os.386bsd.apps:764 +comp.os.386bsd.questions:7326 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1682 Newsgroups: +comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bs +d.misc Path: +sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!jmonroy From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) Subject: More on the Conflict of Interest Message-ID: <jmonroyCHn46z.E0s@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1993 01:01:47 GMT Status: RO Content-Length: 3069 Lines: 62 More on the Conflict of Interest -------------------------------- Recently, in light of the ensueing processes which are deteremined to their rightness, I have been working on the projects that make my financial and professional interest. In short, I don't have time for petty in-fighting. I did not (and have not had) time to read the thread which mentioned the "non-merger" of the *bsd interests. So, comments by me at this time are without reflection on all the present facts. Also, e-mail to me about the "moderator please resign, BS" is sitting in my in-box, and will not be answer until after "The Great Debate". I am aware that at times some of my comments seemed a bit of line, but without all the facts it is just that (a seemingly out-of-line-comment). I really don't have time to play the games that people like T. Deradt want to play. Comment about "net-bag-lady", "mentally-unstable", "politically-uncorrect" and "non-net-equitte" are plain bull, a waste of my time and show a great deal of unprofessionalisim by those involved. In addition, language of vulgar context is not appreciated in my "mbox". In short, expect a harsher treatment by me to you (that take on these tactics). I will still be continuing with this newsgroup, but I must for the sake of the moronic-unstable-childish-pathetic- pre-adolescent-wannabes with dillusion of being the next Bill Gates take on new tactics: 1) Don't expect fairings. 2) If confused read #1. 3) If you can't find a rule to apply read rule #1. 4) If you work for BSDI, USL, Novell or UUNET read rule #1. 5) If you want me to play by *your* rules read rule #1. 6) If you want to reason with me, then send reasonable mail else read rule #1. 7) If you've got a problem with my attitude or the way I say things read rule #1. 8) If you are going to mail me a nasty "this posting is just your way of proving your a XXX" read rule #1. 9) If you expect that I will do less on the account of a handful of wannabes, read rule #1. 10) In case of any confusion, all the above tactics only apply to the moronic-unstable-childish-pathetic- pre-adolescent-wannabes with dillusion of being the next Bill Gates. 11) This is a paranoid fantasy; have fun with it; read rule #1. -- Jesus Monroy Jr jmonroy@netcom.com Zebra Research /386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:13041 comp.os.386bsd.development:1553 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1894 comp.os.386bsd.apps:767 comp.os.386bsd.questions:7336 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1690 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!metro!basser.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!uuspew.uu.net!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!ieunet!news.ieunet.ie!jkh From: jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: More on the Conflict of Interest Date: 08 Dec 1993 10:09:36 GMT Organization: Dublin, Ireland Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.93Dec8020936@whisker.lotus.ie> References: <jmonroyCHn46z.E0s@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: whisker.lotus.ie In-reply-to: jmonroy@netcom.com's message of Tue, 7 Dec 1993 01:01:47 GMT Status: RO Content-Length: 1458 Lines: 27 In article <jmonroyCHn46z.E0s@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes: 1) Don't expect fairings. 2) If confused read #1. I was confused. I read #1. I finally got it - you're a fellow motorcycle rider, winter is approaching, and you're exhorting us all not to expect fairings! Sound advice too, should you happen to borrow or rent someone else's motorcycle and be suddenly faced with a long, cold ride without the benefit of any kind of wind protection. [ Lots more rules deleted, all referring back to the rule about not expecting wind-chill protection ] Sound advice here. Remember, a good pair of gloves (leather, not wool! Wool may look warm but does nothing to keep the wind out!), a thick muffler and a thick padded jacket will save you from looking like Frozen-zombie-from-beyond-the-grave-man when you dismount your trusty steed 50 miles later and find that you're barely unable to detach your frozen fingers from the throttle. Weather may turn cold, and long distance winter motorcycle commutes may continue unabated, but of those of us who take sound advice of Jesus to heart, many are cold but few are frozen. Jordan -- (Jordan K. Hubbard) jkh@violet.berkeley.edu, jkh@al.org, jkh@whisker.lotus.ie =============================================================================