Brewer name: Greg 'groggy' Lehey
Beer style: Groggy Ale
There were two beers: Brew 41 was infused, and Brew 42 was decocted. Apart from this distinction, they were intended
to be identical. Follow the links for more details.
Tasting reports
This beer was tasted on two separate occasions at Grumpy's
Brewhaus. Some of the names have been written down as stylized initials, and I may be wrong
about one or two of them, for all the difference that makes. It's worth noting Andrew and
Thomas (aka “Grumpy one” and “Grumpy too”).
Grog
Tasting: 21 January 2005
These are my own comments.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
A.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
A.
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
(not answered). (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question
is irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
No preference (since I brewed the beer, I knew that it was B).
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
A.
I didn't fill out the detailed comparison. Other comments:
-
A slightly darker than B.
-
B has more hop flavour, but is thinner overall.
Kai
Tasting: 21 January 2005
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
A.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
No preference.
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
A. Carbonation levels seemed different.
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
No idea. (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is
irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
B
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
B.
-
Aroma:
Fruity, lifesaver-esque aroma, light and lollylike.
-
Flavour
Slightly more bitter, seemed to be.
-
Body
Seemed more
-
General Comments
(none)
-
Aroma:
Fruit aroma still there, lifesaver smell absent.
-
Flavour
More “rounded”
-
Body
Seemed less, but carbonation and head (lack of) may have confused me.
-
General Comments
(none)
Unknown taster
Tasting: 21 January 2005
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
No preference.
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
A. Thicker mouthfeel/tongue.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
A.
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
No preference. Appear similar. A may be creamier, tighter bead.
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
No preference. (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is
irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
B.
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
B. It's hot outside.
This taster did not leave any further comments.
Thomas
Tasting: 20 May 2005.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
(not answered) (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is
irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
B
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
B
Look at the clarity and the head of the beers it creamy, thick, thin? Smell each sample. Tast
the beerhat is the first flavour, the middle and finally the last flavour you taste? Is there a
long or a short finish? Is it a thin beer or a thick and chewy beer?
-
Aroma:
Fruity esters.
-
Flavour
Slightly richer than beer "A"
-
Body
Similar to beer "B". Yes, this isn't a transcription error. This is beer B, of
course, but that's what he wrote.
-
General Comments
Well made, clean aftertaste. Low but adequate maltiness.
Andrew
Tasting: 20 May 2005.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
A (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is irrelevant).
And yes, we got a preference anyway :-)
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
A
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
A
Look at the clarity and the head of the beers it creamy, thick, thin? Smell each sample. Tast
the beerhat is the first flavour, the middle and finally the last flavour you taste? Is there a
long or a short finish? Is it a thin beer or a thick and chewy beer?
-
Aroma:
Fruity.
-
Flavour
Bitter, hoppy, not much malt
-
Body
Good
-
General Comments
Good balance, easy drinking.
BMC
Tasting: 20 May 2005.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
A (41)
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
No preference. (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is
irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
No preference.
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
No preference.
Look at the clarity and the head of the beers it creamy, thick, thin? Smell each sample. Tast
the beerhat is the first flavour, the middle and finally the last flavour you taste? Is there a
long or a short finish? Is it a thin beer or a thick and chewy beer?
-
Aroma:
Good aroma of hoppiness. This sample was more highly carbonated, which contributed to
it.
-
Flavour
Good malt and hop balance
-
Body
Good
-
General Comments
A well-balanced beer.
-
Aroma:
Some very subtle hop aroma, with a touch of malt.
-
Flavour
Balanced but slightly towards hoppiness.
-
Body
Good
-
General Comments
A nice beer, possibly a little high in bitterness..
Kai
Tasting: 20 May 2005 (assumed, not stated)
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
B
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
No preference
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
A (41)
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
No preference. (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is
irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
B
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
No preference.
Look at the clarity and the head of the beers it creamy, thick, thin? Smell each sample. Tast
the beerhat is the first flavour, the middle and finally the last flavour you taste? Is there a
long or a short finish? Is it a thin beer or a thick and chewy beer?
-
Aroma:
Low, difficult to describe, low fruit.
-
Flavour
Sweet, low malt, smooth bitterness.
-
Body
Low-mid.
-
General Comments
Easy drinking. Overcarbonated, head too active.
-
Aroma:
Same as A
-
Flavour
Same as A
-
Body
Low-mid, thicker than 41.
-
General Comments
Easy drinking. Overcarbonated, head too active.
Chris
Tasting: 20 May 2005.
-
Which beer seemed to you to be “maltier?”
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to have more body?
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to be sweeter?
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to have better head retention and formation?
A
-
Which beer seemed to you to better fit the BJCP guidelines for this style?
No preference. (note: there are no BJCP guidelines for this style, so the question is
irrelevant).
-
Which beer do you think was decocted?
No preference.
-
Which beer did do you prefer, regardless of other choices?
A
Look at the clarity and the head of the beers it creamy, thick, thin? Smell each sample. Tast
the beerhat is the first flavour, the middle and finally the last flavour you taste? Is there a
long or a short finish? Is it a thin beer or a thick and chewy beer?
$Id: decoction.html,v 1.2 2011/06/11 23:07:59 grog Exp $